Crimson raises $2.5m seed round
Crimson

International arbitration.

Cross-border commercial and investor-state arbitrations with vast exhibit binders and tight memorial deadlines.

International arbitration concentrates extensive records into a small number of decisive written phases. Memorials, counter-memorials, and replies each demand a complete command of thousands of exhibits, witness statements, and expert reports, often in several languages and under procedural rules that leave little room for a second attempt.

Crimson builds the arbitration's Case Model, mapping every exhibit, event, witness, and expert opinion to the claims, defenses, and issues before the tribunal. Counsel can test the other side's case against the record, prepare cross-examination, and draft submissions with every factual assertion cited to the exhibit and page.

Typical case file

  • Requests for arbitration and answers
  • Memorials, counter-memorials, replies, and rejoinders
  • Claimant and respondent exhibits
  • Witness statements and expert reports
  • Redfern schedules and document production
  • Procedural orders and tribunal correspondence
  • Hearing transcripts and post-hearing briefs
  • Contracts, treaties, and applicable law materials

The pressures
facing your team.

01

Memorial-driven procedure

Each written phase must be comprehensive. There is rarely an opportunity to plead new facts after the first case management conference, and new claims typically require tribunal permission.

02

Exhibit-heavy, multilingual records

Thousands of C- and R- exhibits, translations, and document production under Redfern schedules create a record that no individual can hold in their head.

03

Parallel factual and expert narratives

Quantum, delay, and technical experts each build their own account of events. Keeping those accounts consistent with the factual case is essential and laborious.

04

Cross-border teams and time zones

Counsel, co-counsel, experts, and clients across jurisdictions need a single, current understanding of the case that does not depend on any one person's memory.

A Case Model built for
international arbitration.

At upload, Crimson maps the parties, events, disputed facts, claims, defenses and evidence in your matter into a structured Case Model with full provenance. Every workflow below runs on that model.

01

Master the exhibit record

Crimson maps every exhibit to the events, parties, and issues it concerns. Ask what the record shows on any point and receive the exhibits, pages, and passages that matter.

02

Test the other side's memorial

Compare the parties' factual narratives paragraph by paragraph, identify unsupported assertions, and locate the evidence that contradicts them.

03

Prepare witnesses and cross-examination

Surface every document a witness authored, received, or is mentioned in, and every inconsistency between their statement and the contemporaneous record.

04

Keep experts anchored to the facts

Check expert assumptions against the factual chronology, and identify where a quantum or delay analysis relies on contested events.

05

Draft memorials with precise citations

Produce first drafts of factual sections and submissions in your house style, with each assertion referenced to the exhibit number and page.

Questions Crimson answers,
cited to the page.

Illustrative questions from international arbitration matters. Crimson traces each answer to the supporting document, page, and passage.

  • Which exhibits support the Respondent's assertion that the concession was terminated for cause?
  • Where does the Claimant's delay expert rely on events that are disputed in the witness evidence?
  • List every communication between the parties in the six months before the notice of dispute.
  • Identify inconsistencies between Mr. Alvarez's witness statement and the contemporaneous emails.
  • Draft the factual background section on the tender process, citing exhibits.

Common questions from international arbitration teams.

  • Yes. Crimson processes documents in multiple languages and links translations to their originals within the Case Model, so counsel can interrogate the record in their working language while retaining the ability to cite the original exhibit.